Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RUSHETSKY v. RUSHETSKY, 74 So.3d 592 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals of Florida Number: inflco20111123202 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 23, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, ___ So.3d ___, 2011 WL 4056288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also
More

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The failure to provide a transcript or proper substitute requires affirmance except where there is clear error on the face of the judgment. Matteis v. Matteis, ___ So.3d ___, 2011 WL 4056288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). The wife concedes error in the $24 a month credit for noncovered medical expenses, as the child support guidelines worksheet also requires the husband to be 41% responsible for any noncovered medical expenses. As such, we reverse and remand for recalculation of child support without this credit. As to the other issues, we find no clear error on the face of the judgment and thus affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer