CHAVES v. ZIMMER, INC., 2:12-cv-593-FtM-38CM. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160408n14
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #52) filed on April 1, 2016. The Court denies, without prejudice, Defendants' Motion because it does not comply with the undersigned's procedure on motions for summary judgment. As of October 14, 2015, each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged n
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #52) filed on April 1, 2016. The Court denies, without prejudice, Defendants' Motion because it does not comply with the undersigned's procedure on motions for summary judgment. As of October 14, 2015, each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged no..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #52) filed on April 1, 2016. The Court denies, without prejudice, Defendants' Motion because it does not comply with the undersigned's procedure on motions for summary judgment. As of October 14, 2015, each motion for summary judgment must include a specifically captioned section titled, "Statement of Material Facts," that lists each material fact alleged not to be disputed in separate, numbered paragraphs. See Letter to Counsel Regarding Updates to Policies and Procedures (Oct. 14, 2015) (emphasis added).2 Because Defendants' Statement of Material Facts fails to list each fact alleged not to be disputed in separate, numbered paragraphs — and because the undersigned's procedure regarding motions for summary judgment is relatively new — the Court denies Defendants' motion without prejudice.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #52) is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants may file an amended motion for summary judgment that complies with the Court's procedures on or before April 13, 2016. Plaintiffs David Chaves and Rosemary Chaves may file a response thereto within fourteen (14) days of service of Defendants' amended motion for summary judgment.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
2. See also the undersigned's website at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judicialinfo/ftmyers/JgChappell.htm.
Source: Leagle
