ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #114) filed on January 26, 2016. Judge Mirando recommends denying Defendants Erin Mae Rose Quinn and Andrew Lee Fivecoat's Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. #99); Defendant Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas' Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. #100); and Plaintiff Ronald P. Gillis' Motion for Injunction (Doc. #103). The parties do not object to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. This matter is ripe for review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon consideration of Judge Mirando's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #114).

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

DONE and ORDERED.