Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Horizon Air Industries, Inc., 2:17-cv-00121-RSL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20170522488 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 26(f), the parties are required to conduct their Rule 26(f) conference by April 10, 2017. FRCP 16(b) & 26(f). To conserve the parties' resources, the parties jointly move the Court for an order suspending their Rule 26(f) obligations until after the Court has ruled on Defendant's pending motion to dismiss and issued an initial scheduling order, if any. [PR
More

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 26(f), the parties are required to conduct their Rule 26(f) conference by April 10, 2017. FRCP 16(b) & 26(f). To conserve the parties' resources, the parties jointly move the Court for an order suspending their Rule 26(f) obligations until after the Court has ruled on Defendant's pending motion to dismiss and issued an initial scheduling order, if any.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' Rule 26(f) obligations are stayed until the Court rules on defendant's pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22). In the event that any claims remain live after resolution of that motion, the parties shall confer within 14 days of the ruling and file their Rule 26(f) report within 7 days of their conference.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer