Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DAVIS v. AUGUSTINE, 5:11-cv-00384-MP-CJK. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20140408791 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 4, 2014. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that
More

ORDER

MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 4, 2014. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies and also had the time in question credited to another sentence. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and incorporated herein. 2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 12 ), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer