Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant, Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc.'s, Pro Se Answer to Complaint ( Doc. #14 ) filed on August 21, 2014. Although given the opportunity, Defendants did not timely file a response. This matter is now ripe for review. On June 23, 2014, Plaintiff Perdro Cerritos initiated an action against Defendants Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc., Larry Lang
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant, Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc.'s, Pro Se Answer to Complaint ( Doc. #14 ) filed on August 21, 2014. Although given the opportunity, Defendants did not timely file a response. This matter is now ripe for review. On June 23, 2014, Plaintiff Perdro Cerritos initiated an action against Defendants Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc., Larry Langl..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant, Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc.'s, Pro Se Answer to Complaint (Doc. #14) filed on August 21, 2014. Although given the opportunity, Defendants did not timely file a response. This matter is now ripe for review.
On June 23, 2014, Plaintiff Perdro Cerritos initiated an action against Defendants Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc., Larry Langley and Randal Langley. (Doc. #1). Thereafter, the three Defendants jointly filed a pro se response to the Complaint. (See Doc. #12). Now, Cerritos moves to strike the response to the Complaint with respect to Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. because this particular defendant is a corporation that must be represented by an attorney. In addition, Cerritos requests that Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. be given 30 days to obtain legal counsel. Upon consideration, the Court finds the motion is due to be granted. As argued by Cerritos, corporations must be represented by an attorney. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985) ("The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.") (citations omitted). Thus, a corporation like Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. must appear and be heard in this Court only through legal counsel admitted to the court pursuant to Local Rules 2.01 or 2.02. See M.D. Fla. 2.03(d).
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. Motion to Strike Defendant, Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc.'s, Pro Se Answer to Complaint (Doc. #14) is GRANTED. The response to the Complaint (Doc. #12) is STRICKEN with respect to Defendant Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. only.
2. Defendant Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. is directed to obtain an attorney. Its attorney should appear on the docket no later than October 9, 2014. Otherwise, Defendant Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. is directed to file a motion for additional time to obtain counsel. Defendant Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc. is hereby warned that failure to obtain an attorney in a timely manner may result in default against Defendant Performance Plumbing of Southwest Florida, Inc.
3. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Defendants.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
