LOPEZ v. ATM NETWORK, INC., 8:11CV416. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120323b19
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court sua sponte. On February 15, 2012, the court informed the parties by letter of their obligation to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to file a written report of their meeting. See Filing No. 30. The parties' deadline for filing the report was March 16, 2012. However, no planning report has been filed to date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The parties shall report to the court in accordance with
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court sua sponte. On February 15, 2012, the court informed the parties by letter of their obligation to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to file a written report of their meeting. See Filing No. 30. The parties' deadline for filing the report was March 16, 2012. However, no planning report has been filed to date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The parties shall report to the court in accordance with ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court sua sponte. On February 15, 2012, the court informed the parties by letter of their obligation to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to file a written report of their meeting. See Filing No. 30. The parties' deadline for filing the report was March 16, 2012. However, no planning report has been filed to date. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before the close of business on March 29, 2012, or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).
Source: Leagle
