R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. SHERMAN, 133 So.3d 930 (2014)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20140227181
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sherman, 79 So.3d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), a per curiam affirmance citing to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), because we accepted jurisdiction in Brown based on express and direct conflict. We have since discharged jurisdiction in Brown. Therefore, there is no basis to exercise jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismi
Summary: PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sherman, 79 So.3d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), a per curiam affirmance citing to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), because we accepted jurisdiction in Brown based on express and direct conflict. We have since discharged jurisdiction in Brown. Therefore, there is no basis to exercise jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismis..
More
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sherman, 79 So.3d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), a per curiam affirmance citing to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), because we accepted jurisdiction in Brown based on express and direct conflict. We have since discharged jurisdiction in Brown. Therefore, there is no basis to exercise jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss review.
No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.330(d)(2).
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
