Filed: Jan. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) be granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) be denied. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) be granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) be denied. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact a..
More
ORDER
PAUL G. BYRON, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) be granted and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) be denied.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation filed January 14, 2019, (Doc. 35), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is DENIED.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff, and to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
