FUTCH v. CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CV410-192. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120308a35
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Prison Health Services, Inc. and Defendant Chatham County Detention Center's ("Defendants") Motion to Strike. (Doc. 39.) Plaintiff did not file any response to the motion. After careful consideration, the motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. On February 8, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendants' original motion for summary judgment and took the amended summary judgment motion under advisement. (Doc. 45.) The order provided th
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Prison Health Services, Inc. and Defendant Chatham County Detention Center's ("Defendants") Motion to Strike. (Doc. 39.) Plaintiff did not file any response to the motion. After careful consideration, the motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. On February 8, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendants' original motion for summary judgment and took the amended summary judgment motion under advisement. (Doc. 45.) The order provided tha..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Prison Health Services, Inc. and Defendant Chatham County Detention Center's ("Defendants") Motion to Strike. (Doc. 39.) Plaintiff did not file any response to the motion. After careful consideration, the motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
On February 8, 2012, the Court dismissed Defendants' original motion for summary judgment and took the amended summary judgment motion under advisement. (Doc. 45.) The order provided that the Court will not consider or accept "any documents filed in response or reply to that original motion" when ruling on the amended motion. (Id. at 2.) Responses to the amended motion (Doc. 41) and statement of material facts (Doc. 43) were due on March 2, 2012. Plaintiff did not file any responses thereto. Because Defendants seek to strike information contained in Plaintiff's response to the original summary judgment motion, the motion to strike is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
