MIKELL v. U.S., CR606-026. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160520a96
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . Bob Aaron Mikell's Objection (doc. 106) and latest Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion (doc. 107) are OVERRULED and DENIED respectively. The Court agrees with the Government: "Rule 60 is not a mechanism that permits litigants to resurrect closed cases just because they belatedly believe that they should have made a better or different argument. Mikell's criminal conviction is final, his 2255 motion has been denied for years, and this Court's judgment sho
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL , District Judge . Bob Aaron Mikell's Objection (doc. 106) and latest Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion (doc. 107) are OVERRULED and DENIED respectively. The Court agrees with the Government: "Rule 60 is not a mechanism that permits litigants to resurrect closed cases just because they belatedly believe that they should have made a better or different argument. Mikell's criminal conviction is final, his 2255 motion has been denied for years, and this Court's judgment shou..
More
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
Bob Aaron Mikell's Objection (doc. 106) and latest Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion (doc. 107) are OVERRULED and DENIED respectively. The Court agrees with the Government: "Rule 60 is not a mechanism that permits litigants to resurrect closed cases just because they belatedly believe that they should have made a better or different argument. Mikell's criminal conviction is final, his § 2255 motion has been denied for years, and this Court's judgment should remain undisturbed." Doc. 108 at 3.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
