Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ALSUP v. U.S. BANCORP, 2:14-cv-01515-KJM-DAD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141017787 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On October 10, 2014, the court held a hearing on the defendant's motion to dismiss. Sheri Leonard appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, Marlene Alsup, and Emilie Woodhead and Joan Fife appeared on behalf of the defendant, U.S. Bank. During the hearing, the plaintiff referred the court to Diaz v. Federal Express Corp., 373 F.Supp.2d 1034 (C.D. Cal. 2005), a case the parties had not previously cited or discussed in their briefing. On October 14, 201
More

ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

On October 10, 2014, the court held a hearing on the defendant's motion to dismiss. Sheri Leonard appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, Marlene Alsup, and Emilie Woodhead and Joan Fife appeared on behalf of the defendant, U.S. Bank.

During the hearing, the plaintiff referred the court to Diaz v. Federal Express Corp., 373 F.Supp.2d 1034 (C.D. Cal. 2005), a case the parties had not previously cited or discussed in their briefing. On October 14, 2015, the defendants requested leave to file a supplemental brief on the applicability of Diaz, ECF No. 16, and filed a short proposed brief, ECF No. 16-1.

Defendant's request is granted and its supplemental brief is deemed filed as of the date its proposed brief was filed. If plaintiff wishes to respond, it may file a brief of five or fewer pages no later than seven days from the issuance of this order. Thereafter the matter will be submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer