Allen v. Allenby, 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200303964
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY THE CASE ECF No. 77 JEREMY PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff moves the court to stay this case while awaiting a Ninth Circuit decision in another case. ECF No. 77. In seeking a stay, plaintiff raises the same arguments that defendants made earlier in the case—arguments that we have already evaluated and denied. 1 See ECF No. 71 at 7-8. Thus, plaintiff has failed to provide good cause for a stay, and we deny his motion. We note that the cour
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY THE CASE ECF No. 77 JEREMY PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff moves the court to stay this case while awaiting a Ninth Circuit decision in another case. ECF No. 77. In seeking a stay, plaintiff raises the same arguments that defendants made earlier in the case—arguments that we have already evaluated and denied. 1 See ECF No. 71 at 7-8. Thus, plaintiff has failed to provide good cause for a stay, and we deny his motion. We note that the court..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY THE CASE
ECF No. 77
JEREMY PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff moves the court to stay this case while awaiting a Ninth Circuit decision in another case. ECF No. 77. In seeking a stay, plaintiff raises the same arguments that defendants made earlier in the case—arguments that we have already evaluated and denied.1 See ECF No. 71 at 7-8. Thus, plaintiff has failed to provide good cause for a stay, and we deny his motion. We note that the court currently is attempting to identify counsel to assist plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. If both parties agree a stay is appropriate, they might consider seeking a stipulated stay.
Source: Leagle
