United States v. Hirst, 16-CR-0371 (RA). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200109771
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Petitioner, dated December 15, 2019 (Dkt. 835). According to the letter, Petitioner received the Court's November 18, 2019 Order on November 29, 2019. He now submits a signed, but unnotarized, copy of the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver. Petitioner explains that while a notary visits the correctional institution where he is currently incarcerated about "every month or so," a notary has not visited that in
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Petitioner, dated December 15, 2019 (Dkt. 835). According to the letter, Petitioner received the Court's November 18, 2019 Order on November 29, 2019. He now submits a signed, but unnotarized, copy of the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver. Petitioner explains that while a notary visits the correctional institution where he is currently incarcerated about "every month or so," a notary has not visited that ins..
More
ORDER
RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the letter filed by Petitioner, dated December 15, 2019 (Dkt. 835). According to the letter, Petitioner received the Court's November 18, 2019 Order on November 29, 2019. He now submits a signed, but unnotarized, copy of the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver. Petitioner explains that while a notary visits the correctional institution where he is currently incarcerated about "every month or so," a notary has not visited that institution since he received the Court's Order. Petitioner also asserts that he has "another photocopy" of the Waiver, and that he intends to return it, both signed and notarized, "as soon as there is a notary visit." In light of these circumstances, the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver that Petitioner has filed is sufficient to authorize the disclosure of information needed to permit the Government to respond to Petitioner's motion. The Government shall treat this Waiver as the "executed `Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver (Informed Consent)' form." Additionally, Petitioner is instructed to file a signed and notarized copy of the Waiver as soon as he is able to.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
