STODDARD v. STATE, 189 So.3d 1046 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20160420222
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2016
Summary: PER CURIAM . Kenneth Wayne Stoddard appeals his judgments and sentences for aggravated manslaughter of a child under eighteen by culpable negligence, aggravated child abuse, and tampering with evidence. We affirm on all issues. However, we do so without prejudice to Mr. Stoddard's filing of a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dante v. State, 903 So.2d 293 , 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
Summary: PER CURIAM . Kenneth Wayne Stoddard appeals his judgments and sentences for aggravated manslaughter of a child under eighteen by culpable negligence, aggravated child abuse, and tampering with evidence. We affirm on all issues. However, we do so without prejudice to Mr. Stoddard's filing of a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dante v. State, 903 So.2d 293 , 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel o..
More
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Wayne Stoddard appeals his judgments and sentences for aggravated manslaughter of a child under eighteen by culpable negligence, aggravated child abuse, and tampering with evidence. We affirm on all issues. However, we do so without prejudice to Mr. Stoddard's filing of a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dante v. State, 903 So.2d 293, 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record for erroneously withdrawing challenge to juror but affirming without prejudice to appellant's filing of a postconviction motion); Jenkins v. State, 824 So.2d 977, 983 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ("In a situation where the record demonstrates that an ostensibly biased juror served on a jury, without objection, then a hearing is appropriate to see if the defense attorney had a tactical reason for not challenging the juror for cause.").
Affirmed.
LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Source: Leagle
