Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DERHEIMER v. FULTON-DEKALB HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, 1:11-CV-2554-CC. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20120718812 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER CLARENCE COOPER, Senior District Judge. This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker's Final Report and Recommendation (hereinafter the "Report") [Doc. No. 59] on the Motion to Dismiss the Action (hereinafter the "Motion to Dismiss") filed by Plaintiff Mary Derheimer ("Plaintiff Derheimer") and Plaintiff Donald Thomas ("Plaintiff Thomas") (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Walker recommends that the Court dismiss
More

ORDER

CLARENCE COOPER, Senior District Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker's Final Report and Recommendation (hereinafter the "Report") [Doc. No. 59] on the Motion to Dismiss the Action (hereinafter the "Motion to Dismiss") filed by Plaintiff Mary Derheimer ("Plaintiff Derheimer") and Plaintiff Donald Thomas ("Plaintiff Thomas") (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Walker recommends that the Court dismiss without prejudice the above-styled action on the condition that, if Plaintiffs refile their action against Defendant Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority doing business as Grady Health System and Defendant Grady Memorial Hospital Corporation (collectively referred to as "Defendants"), the Court will assess whether the costs incurred by Defendants from this action should be imposed on Plaintiffs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d). The record reflects that no objections to the Report have been filed, and the time period for submitting objections has elapsed. The Court, having conducted a plain error review in accordance with United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983), finds that the Report is correct both in fact and in law. The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report as the decision of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Report, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 56] and DISMISSES without prejudice the above-styled action subject to the condition specified in the Report.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer