Merilien v. Granison, CV 318-056. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190214883
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed, (doc. no. 117). In his objections, Plaintiff states he is confused by the Magistrate Judge's January 18, 2019 Order prohibiting him from submitting additional filings until ordered to do so by the Court and indicates he is not sure whether he should file objections. ( Id. at 1.) The Janu
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed, (doc. no. 117). In his objections, Plaintiff states he is confused by the Magistrate Judge's January 18, 2019 Order prohibiting him from submitting additional filings until ordered to do so by the Court and indicates he is not sure whether he should file objections. ( Id. at 1.) The Janua..
More
ORDER
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed, (doc. no. 117). In his objections, Plaintiff states he is confused by the Magistrate Judge's January 18, 2019 Order prohibiting him from submitting additional filings until ordered to do so by the Court and indicates he is not sure whether he should file objections. (Id. at 1.) The January 17, 2019 Order directing service of the Magistrate Judge's R&R and setting the objections deadline stated the objecting party "must file" objections by the deadline. (Doc. no. 105.) Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to file objections by the February 4 deadline. Plaintiff filed objections, and the Court has considered them here. However, nothing in Plaintiff's objections warrants deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. no. 70.)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
