UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.

On January 8, 2016, Ann Stoneburner ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the high-dose influenza ("flu") vaccine on September 9, 2014, she suffered an injury to her left shoulder. Petition at 1-3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit ("SPU") of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 23, 2016, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). On August 4, 2016, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $150,843.84. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $150,843.84 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Ann Stoneburner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1

I. Procedural History

On January 8, 2016, Ann Stoneburner ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation ("Petition") under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to — 34, as amended. She alleges that, as a result of receiving the high-dose influenza ("flu") vaccine on September 9, 2014, she suffered from a left shoulder injury. Petition at 1-3.

On March 23, 2016, respondent filed her Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, conceding causation-in-fact for petitioner's shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). On that same day, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for SIRVA.

II. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $150,843.84, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

III. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $150,843.84, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.2 Petitioner agrees.