VEGA v. CIRCLE K STORES INC., 2:14-cv-298-FtM-38CM. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150324c23
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on review of the file. On January 12, 2015, Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings ( Doc. #26 ), which Plaintiff Aida Vega opposed ( Doc. #27 ). Since then, Defendant filed a Notice of Settlement. ( Doc. #38 ). As the parties have settled this case, the Court denies Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings ( Doc. #26 ) as moot. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant Circle K
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on review of the file. On January 12, 2015, Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings ( Doc. #26 ), which Plaintiff Aida Vega opposed ( Doc. #27 ). Since then, Defendant filed a Notice of Settlement. ( Doc. #38 ). As the parties have settled this case, the Court denies Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings ( Doc. #26 ) as moot. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant Circle K S..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on review of the file. On January 12, 2015, Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. #26), which Plaintiff Aida Vega opposed (Doc. #27). Since then, Defendant filed a Notice of Settlement. (Doc. #38). As the parties have settled this case, the Court denies Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. #26) as moot.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. #26) is DENIED as moot.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
