Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Labarbera, 2:15-cr-106-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180703a28 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Motion in Support of Early Termination of Defendant's Probation (Doc. #181) filed on June 28, 2018. Counsel moves the Court for an order permitting early termination of the Defendant's term of probation. As grounds, counsel indicates that the Defendant served 21 months of the 3 year term originally imposed and has been in compliance with all the terms and conditions imposed. Defendant has also paid her
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on Motion in Support of Early Termination of Defendant's Probation (Doc. #181) filed on June 28, 2018. Counsel moves the Court for an order permitting early termination of the Defendant's term of probation. As grounds, counsel indicates that the Defendant served 21 months of the 3 year term originally imposed and has been in compliance with all the terms and conditions imposed. Defendant has also paid her restitution in full and completed 300 hundred hours of community service. Probation officer, Melissa Rangel, has no objection to the early termination of probation. For good cause shown, the court will grant the termination of the Defendant's probation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Motion in Support of Early Termination of Defendant's Probation (Doc. 181) is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer