MOSLEY v. MEDLIN, CV 313-086. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150130c20
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge. The above-captioned matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to "relate back plea." (Doc. no. 33.) In his motion, Plaintiff summarizes his allegations and requests that the Court decide this case solely upon his ability to prove the allegations of his original complaint relating to the purportedly deficient investigation by physical evidence. These claims were previously dismissed and also addressed in orders denying Plaintiff's motion to amend, (
Summary: ORDER BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge. The above-captioned matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to "relate back plea." (Doc. no. 33.) In his motion, Plaintiff summarizes his allegations and requests that the Court decide this case solely upon his ability to prove the allegations of his original complaint relating to the purportedly deficient investigation by physical evidence. These claims were previously dismissed and also addressed in orders denying Plaintiff's motion to amend, (d..
More
ORDER
BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.
The above-captioned matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to "relate back plea." (Doc. no. 33.) In his motion, Plaintiff summarizes his allegations and requests that the Court decide this case solely upon his ability to prove the allegations of his original complaint relating to the purportedly deficient investigation by physical evidence. These claims were previously dismissed and also addressed in orders denying Plaintiff's motion to amend, (doc. no. 30), and granting Defendants' motion in limine, (doc. nos. 29, 40). Because Plaintiff in essence requests that the Court ignore these orders and allow these claims back into the case, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
