Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

METALLO v. ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION, 6:14-cv-1975-Orl-40KRS. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20151222b41 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER KARLA R. SPAULDING , Magistrate Judge . This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RENDITION OF ORDER AUTHORIZING UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFIRAMS TO RELEASE PLAINTIFF'S MEDICAL RECORDS (Doc. No. 79) FILED: December 17, 2015 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Defendants have served a subpoena on the United States Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") s
More

ORDER

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:

MOTION: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RENDITION OF ORDER AUTHORIZING UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFIRAMS TO RELEASE PLAINTIFF'S MEDICAL RECORDS (Doc. No. 79) FILED: December 17, 2015 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

Defendants have served a subpoena on the United States Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") seeking release of Plaintiff William R. Metallo's medical records. Counsel for Defendants represent that Mr. Metallo does not object to production of these records.

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7332(b)(2)(D), the VA may comply with the subpoena if the subpoena is authorized by an order of this Court upon a showing of good cause therefor.1 Mr. Metallo has placed his medical conditions at issue in the complaint, which alleges that he is disabled. Mr. Metallo has not voluntarily produced his medical records in discovery. Accordingly, good cause exists to permit Defendants to obtain these records through the subpoena served on the VA. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the subpoena served by Defendants on the VA is authorized by this Order of the Court.

Section 7332(b)(2)(D) also requires this Court to impose appropriate safeguards against unauthorized disclosure of Mr. Metallo's medical records. It is, therefore, ORDERED that counsel for Defendants shall treat Mr. Metallo's medical records as confidential and disclose them only to the parties, counsel for the parties and their support staff, expert witnesses, and the Court. This Order shall not be construed, however, as permission to file any of these medical records under seal.

Counsel for Defendants are directed to deliver a copy of this Order to the VA forthwith.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Section 7332(b)(2)(D) does not require that the subpoena be signed by a judge of this Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer