ERWOOD v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, 14-1284. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150424f90
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER OF COURT NORA BARRY FISCHER , District Judge . AND NOW, this day of 23rd day of April, 2015, after the Plaintiff Patricia Erwood filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after an Opinion was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. [53]) denying a "Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America, (Docket No. [39]), and also noted that the parties had fourteen days to file written objec
Summary: ORDER OF COURT NORA BARRY FISCHER , District Judge . AND NOW, this day of 23rd day of April, 2015, after the Plaintiff Patricia Erwood filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after an Opinion was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. [53]) denying a "Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America, (Docket No. [39]), and also noted that the parties had fourteen days to file written object..
More
ORDER OF COURT
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this day of 23rd day of April, 2015, after the Plaintiff Patricia Erwood filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after an Opinion was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. [53]) denying a "Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America, (Docket No. [39]), and also noted that the parties had fourteen days to file written objections thereto, to which no objections have been timely submitted by any of the parties, and upon independent review of the record, and consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge's Opinion, (Docket No. [53]), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [39] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
