PEEDE v. STATE, 94 So.3d 500 (2012)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number: inflco20120426238
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011). It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011).
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
