Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lobato v. Berryhill, CV17-907 KRS. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20180213933 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME KEVIN R. SWEAZEA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 14), it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through February 16, 2018, to serve her Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision
More

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 14), it being stated that opposing counsel concurs in the granting of the Motion, and the Court having read the Motion and being fully advised of the premises,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted through February 16, 2018, to serve her Motion to Reverse or Remand Administrative Agency Decision with Supporting Memorandum.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is granted through March 19, 2018 to serve her Response, and Plaintiff through March 30, 2018 to serve her Reply.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer