Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Real v. City of Fort Myers, 2:18-cv-74-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181129b60 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Mamberto Real's Notice to the Court or the Clerk (Doc. 57), which the Court construes as a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Real wishes to appeal the Court's order granting Defendants the City of Fort Myers and Glorida Camacho's motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 55). And he wants to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. A review of his filings reflects that he qual
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Mamberto Real's Notice to the Court or the Clerk (Doc. 57), which the Court construes as a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Real wishes to appeal the Court's order granting Defendants the City of Fort Myers and Glorida Camacho's motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 55). And he wants to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. A review of his filings reflects that he qualifies as indigent and that his appeal is in good faith. Consequently, the Court will grant him in forma pauperis relief.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff Mamberto Real's Notice to the Court or the Clerk (Doc. 57) construed as a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this Order with the record to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer