NATTY v. HOLDER, 2:11-CV-0156-RWS. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120221833
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [34] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections [35], and Respondents' Reply [36], the Report and Recommendation is received with approval and adopted as the Opinion and Order of this Court. The Court finds that each of the issues raised in Petitioner's Objections was properly addressed in the Report and R
Summary: ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [34] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections [35], and Respondents' Reply [36], the Report and Recommendation is received with approval and adopted as the Opinion and Order of this Court. The Court finds that each of the issues raised in Petitioner's Objections was properly addressed in the Report and Re..
More
ORDER
RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge.
This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [34] of Magistrate Judge Susan S. Cole. After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections [35], and Respondents' Reply [36], the Report and Recommendation is received with approval and adopted as the Opinion and Order of this Court. The Court finds that each of the issues raised in Petitioner's Objections was properly addressed in the Report and Recommendation.
Based on the foregoing, Respondent Stone's Motion to Dismiss and to Substitute [9] is GRANTED; Petitioner's Motions to Deny Respondent Stone's Motion to Dismiss [11 and 14] are DENIED; Petitioner's Motion for Emergency Injunction [12] is DENIED, as moot; Petitioner's Motions to Dismiss the Federal Respondents' Response [18, 20, and 21] and Motion to Dismiss Their Supplemental Response [27] are DENIED; and the Habeas Corpus Petition [1] is DISMISSED, as moot.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
