SIMMS v. BUTLER, A18D0136. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Number: ingaco20171101340
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2017
Summary: Order Deborah Simms filed a petition in the superior court seeking judicial review of an administrative ruling of the Department of Labor Board of Review (the "Board") that found Simms ineligible for the receipt of unemployment benefits. On June 26, 2017, the superior court affirmed the Board's decision. Simms 1 filed this pro se application for discretionary appeal on October 10, 2017. We, however, lack jurisdiction. A discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the j
Summary: Order Deborah Simms filed a petition in the superior court seeking judicial review of an administrative ruling of the Department of Labor Board of Review (the "Board") that found Simms ineligible for the receipt of unemployment benefits. On June 26, 2017, the superior court affirmed the Board's decision. Simms 1 filed this pro se application for discretionary appeal on October 10, 2017. We, however, lack jurisdiction. A discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the ju..
More
Order
Deborah Simms filed a petition in the superior court seeking judicial review of an administrative ruling of the Department of Labor Board of Review (the "Board") that found Simms ineligible for the receipt of unemployment benefits. On June 26, 2017, the superior court affirmed the Board's decision. Simms1 filed this pro se application for discretionary appeal on October 10, 2017. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
A discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.App. 734, 734 (380 S.E.2d 57) (1989); see also In the Interest of B. R. F., 338 Ga.App. 762, 762 (791 S.E.2d 859) (2016) (filing deadline for discretionary applications "is jurisdictional, and this court is unable to accept an untimely application"). Because Simms filed this application 106 days after entry of the judgment she seeks to appeal, it is untimely, and we lack jurisdiction to consider it. Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.
FootNotes
1. On July 3, 2017, Simms initially filed a direct appeal from the superior court's order affirming the Board's decision. We dismissed the appeal, however, because of her failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedures. See Case No. A18A0185 (decided September 27, 2017); Dunlap v. City of Atlanta, 272 Ga. 523, 524 (531 S.E.2d 702) (2000) (under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), appeals from orders of superior courts reviewing decisions of state administrative agencies must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review).
Source: Leagle
