Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. NEVATT, 16-00150-08-CR-W-DGK. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20170831c94 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY SARAH W. HAYS , District Judge . The Defendant appeared before me pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, Local Rule 72.1(e)(27), and 28 U.S.C. 636 and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(A) and (B) to the Information filed on August 8, 2017. The Plea Agreement specifies that the Government will dismiss the Superseding Indictment currently pending against the defendant, as it pertains to this defendant, at sentencing. I det
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant appeared before me pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, Local Rule 72.1(e)(27), and 28 U.S.C. § 636 and entered a plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(A) and (B) to the Information filed on August 8, 2017. The Plea Agreement specifies that the Government will dismiss the Superseding Indictment currently pending against the defendant, as it pertains to this defendant, at sentencing. I determined that the guilty plea is knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. A record was made of the proceedings and a transcript is available. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer