U.S. v. SHAW, 1:11-CR-239-29-CAP-ECS. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120313833
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER CHARLES A. PANNELL, Jr., District Judge. This matter is currently before the court on the February 10, 2012, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("the R&R") [Doc. No. 546]. After carefully considering the R&R and the objections thereto filed by the government [Doc. No. 557], the court receives the R&R with approval and ADOPTS it as the opinion and order of this court. Accordingly, the defendant's motions to suppress [Doc. Nos. 338 and 362] are GRANTED insofar as they reque
Summary: ORDER CHARLES A. PANNELL, Jr., District Judge. This matter is currently before the court on the February 10, 2012, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("the R&R") [Doc. No. 546]. After carefully considering the R&R and the objections thereto filed by the government [Doc. No. 557], the court receives the R&R with approval and ADOPTS it as the opinion and order of this court. Accordingly, the defendant's motions to suppress [Doc. Nos. 338 and 362] are GRANTED insofar as they reques..
More
ORDER
CHARLES A. PANNELL, Jr., District Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on the February 10, 2012, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("the R&R") [Doc. No. 546]. After carefully considering the R&R and the objections thereto filed by the government [Doc. No. 557], the court receives the R&R with approval and ADOPTS it as the opinion and order of this court. Accordingly, the defendant's motions to suppress [Doc. Nos. 338 and 362] are GRANTED insofar as they request suppression of the evidence obtained from the cell phones as the result of the search warrants.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
