BULLARD v. US BANK, N.A., 3:10cv434/MCR/CJK. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120503920
Visitors: 30
Filed: May 02, 2012
Latest Update: May 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge. Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 23, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). No timely objections have been filed. 1 Having reviewed the Recommendation and the record de novo, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge. Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 23, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). No timely objections have been filed. 1 Having reviewed the Recommendation and the record de novo, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order...
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 23, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). No timely objections have been filed.1 Having reviewed the Recommendation and the record de novo, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The plaintiffs' counsel, Bruce E. Committee, is required within a time certain, to pay as sanctions to US Bank and its attorneys the amount of $2,125.03.
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The plaintiffs filed a notice of non-objection to the attorney fee rate on May 1, 2012, which the court construes as an objection to the Report and Recommendation. However, it was filed well outside the fourteen-day time for filing objections, with no request for leave to file late, and thus, the court has not considered it.
Source: Leagle
