Filed: Mar. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for home-invasion robbery pursuant to section 812.135(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). See Clark v. State, 85 So.3d 1190 , 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's error). AFFIRMED and REMANDED. PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. FootNotes 1. Anders v. California, 386 U
Summary: PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for home-invasion robbery pursuant to section 812.135(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). See Clark v. State, 85 So.3d 1190 , 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's error). AFFIRMED and REMANDED. PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. FootNotes 1. Anders v. California, 386 U...
More
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for home-invasion robbery pursuant to section 812.135(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009). See Clark v. State, 85 So.3d 1190, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's error).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
