TRAVCO INSURANCE COMPANY v. WARD, 10-1710. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130115104
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry Ward appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Travco Insurance Company and declaring that he is not entitled to coverage under his homeowners insurance policy for alleged drywall-related damages to his home. The district court found that four provisions of the policy excluded coverage. Previously, we certified the following question of Virginia law to the Supreme Court of Virginia: For purpos
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry Ward appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Travco Insurance Company and declaring that he is not entitled to coverage under his homeowners insurance policy for alleged drywall-related damages to his home. The district court found that four provisions of the policy excluded coverage. Previously, we certified the following question of Virginia law to the Supreme Court of Virginia: For purpose..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Ward appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Travco Insurance Company and declaring that he is not entitled to coverage under his homeowners insurance policy for alleged drywall-related damages to his home. The district court found that four provisions of the policy excluded coverage. Previously, we certified the following question of Virginia law to the Supreme Court of Virginia:
For purposes of interpreting an "all risk" homeowners insurance policy, is any damage resulting from this drywall unambiguously excluded from coverage under the policy because it is loss caused by:
(a) "mechanical breakdown, latent defect, inherent vice, or any quality in property that causes it to damage itself";
(b) "faulty, inadequate, or defective materials";
(c) "rust or other corrosion"; or
(d) "pollutants," where pollutant is defined as "any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals and waste?"
Travco Ins. Co. v. Ward, 468 Fed. Appx. 195, 195-96 (4th Cir. 2012).
The Supreme Court of Virginia has now answered all subparts of the certified question in the affirmative. Travco Ins. Co. v. Ward, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Va. Nov. 1, 2012) (2012 WL 5358705). The parties agree, and we find, that the court's answers warrant affirmance of the judgment. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
