REESE v. U.S., 6:11-cv-57. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120327a95
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. Derrick Reese ("Reese") has appealed this Court's Order dismissing his U.S.C. 2255 motion. See Doc. 18. The Court construes Reese's notice of appeal as a request for a Certificate of Appealability ("COA") and for in forma pauperis ("IFP") status on appeal. See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083 , 1084 (11th Cir. 1997). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Reese's 2255 motion. See Doc. 12 at 11-12 (Report and Recomme
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. Derrick Reese ("Reese") has appealed this Court's Order dismissing his U.S.C. 2255 motion. See Doc. 18. The Court construes Reese's notice of appeal as a request for a Certificate of Appealability ("COA") and for in forma pauperis ("IFP") status on appeal. See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083 , 1084 (11th Cir. 1997). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Reese's 2255 motion. See Doc. 12 at 11-12 (Report and Recommen..
More
ORDER
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.
Derrick Reese ("Reese") has appealed this Court's Order dismissing his U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Doc. 18. The Court construes Reese's notice of appeal as a request for a Certificate of Appealability ("COA") and for in forma pauperis ("IFP") status on appeal. See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083, 1084 (11th Cir. 1997).
The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Reese's § 2255 motion. See Doc. 12 at 11-12 (Report and Recommendation ("R&R")). The Magistrate Judge also recommended that the Court deny Reese a COA and the ability to appeal IFP. See id. at 12-13. This Court adopted the R&R and dismissed Reese's case. See Doc. 16. Reese's implied motions are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. The Court assesses the full filing fee of $455.
Source: Leagle
