MORALES v. ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY, 8:10-cv-733-T-30TGW. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120307940
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 126), and Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 130). This Court recently granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on all counts ( see Dkts. 121 & 124). The sole basis for the Court's decision was its conclusion that a workers' compensation policy exclusion contained in the relevant insurance policy functioned to bar coverage for Pl
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 126), and Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 130). This Court recently granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on all counts ( see Dkts. 121 & 124). The sole basis for the Court's decision was its conclusion that a workers' compensation policy exclusion contained in the relevant insurance policy functioned to bar coverage for Pla..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 126), and Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition (Dkt. 130).
This Court recently granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on all counts (see Dkts. 121 & 124). The sole basis for the Court's decision was its conclusion that a workers' compensation policy exclusion contained in the relevant insurance policy functioned to bar coverage for Plaintiffs' claims. In its Motion for Reconsideration, Plaintiffs argue that this exclusion should not apply, reiterating their arguments presented on summary judgment. As this Court has already extensively analyzed, and rejected, these arguments, it is appropriate to deny Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 126) is hereby DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
