Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HALL, CR 111-270. (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20120316a78 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Hall is competent to stand trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 4241. SO ORDERED.

ORDER

J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Defendant Hall is competent to stand trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 4241.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer