Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 5:19-cv-102-Oc-30PRL. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190326a15 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER PHILIP R. LAMMENS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, as the alleged owner of the copyrights for motion pictures distributed through the Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, and Vixen adult brands, seeks permission to serve Comcast Cable, the defendant's alleged Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), with a subpoena before the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference. (Doc. 8). With an assumption that the subscriber is the infringer, it alleges the defendant, kno
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, as the alleged owner of the copyrights for motion pictures distributed through the Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, and Vixen adult brands, seeks permission to serve Comcast Cable, the defendant's alleged Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), with a subpoena before the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference. (Doc. 8). With an assumption that the subscriber is the infringer, it alleges the defendant, known to it only by an internet protocol ("IP") address, infringed its copyright by using BitTorrent protocol1 to copy and distribute the movie. It argues it needs early discovery to learn defendant's identity. Id.

A court has broad discretion in managing discovery. Klay v. All Defendants, 425 F.3d 977, 982 (11th Cir. 2005). A court may permit a party to conduct discovery before a Rule 26(f) conference. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1). Courts usually require a showing of good cause for early discovery. See TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Holden Prop. Servs., LLC, 299 F.R.D. 692, 694 (S.D. Fla. 2014); Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176, 270 F.R.D. 239, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); Dorrah v. United States, 282 F.R.D. 442, 445 (N.D. Iowa 2012).

Here, Plaintiff has established good cause for early discovery: it has sufficiently alleged infringement, it does not have another way to discover the putative infringer's identity to proceed with the litigation; and ISPs rarely maintain the information for long. The Court therefore GRANTS Plaintiff's motion, (Doc. 8), as follows:

1. Plaintiff may serve on Comcast Cable a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoena commanding the name, address, email address, and telephone number of the subscriber of the identified IP address. The subpoena must attach the complaint and this order. 2. Plaintiff may use the subscriber's information only to protect and enforce its rights set forth in the complaint. 3. If Comcast Cable is a "cable operator" under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5),2 it must comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2), which permits a cable operator to disclose personal identifying information if the disclosure is "made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed," by sending a copy of this order to the defendant.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because many courts have already done so, the Court will refrain from describing the BitTorrent protocol here. See, e.g., Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v. Fung, 710 F.3d 1020, 1026 -27 (9th Cir. 2013); Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1 -28, 295 F.R.D. 527, 529-30 (M.D. Fla. 2012).
2. Section 522(5) defines a "cable operator" as "any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system."
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer