Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JONES, 1:16-cr-0015-AT-22. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20161221d20 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as to Defendant Bettie Jones' motion to suppress statements [Doc. 541]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Defendant's motion. The Court notes that no objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Cou
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as to Defendant Bettie Jones' motion to suppress statements [Doc. 541]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Defendant's motion.

The Court notes that no objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Court receives the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation with approval and hereby ADOPTS the Report and

Recommendation as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court DENIES Defendant's motions to suppress [Doc. 373].

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer