MADRIGAL v. PROGRESS ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC, 6:13-cv-575-Orl-31GJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140721779
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Bill of Costs and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 41), filed May 30, 2014, and construed as a Motion to Review Bill of Costs. On June 30, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 45) recommending that Defendants be awarded costs as billed. No objection to that report was filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as fo
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Bill of Costs and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 41), filed May 30, 2014, and construed as a Motion to Review Bill of Costs. On June 30, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 45) recommending that Defendants be awarded costs as billed. No objection to that report was filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as fol..
More
ORDER
GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Bill of Costs and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 41), filed May 30, 2014, and construed as a Motion to Review Bill of Costs.
On June 30, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 45) recommending that Defendants be awarded costs as billed. No objection to that report was filed. Therefore, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 45) is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.
2. The Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Bill of Costs and Memorandum of Law in Support of its Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED.
3. Defendants are awarded $232.25 in costs.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle