TOOR v. U.S., CV613-047. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20130531c57
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 30, 2013
Latest Update: May 30, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Gurpartap Singh Toor has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion, even though he cites no federal, but only a state court conviction. Doc. 1. Meanwhile, he filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition in Toor v. Moralas, No. CV613-051, where the Court this day is recommending dismissal because he has disregarded its $5 filing-fee deficiency notice. The level of sophistication shown in Toor's filings reveals no accident here. Toor simply does not want to
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Gurpartap Singh Toor has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion, even though he cites no federal, but only a state court conviction. Doc. 1. Meanwhile, he filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition in Toor v. Moralas, No. CV613-051, where the Court this day is recommending dismissal because he has disregarded its $5 filing-fee deficiency notice. The level of sophistication shown in Toor's filings reveals no accident here. Toor simply does not want to p..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Gurpartap Singh Toor has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, even though he cites no federal, but only a state court conviction. Doc. 1. Meanwhile, he filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in Toor v. Moralas, No. CV613-051, where the Court this day is recommending dismissal because he has disregarded its $5 filing-fee deficiency notice. The level of sophistication shown in Toor's filings reveals no accident here. Toor simply does not want to pay the $5 filing fee (there is no fee for a § 2255 motion, but he must pay $5 for § 2241 or § 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitions). Accordingly, Toor's § 2255 motion should be DISMISSED.
SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.
Source: Leagle
