VALDEZ v. COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC., 2:09-CV-01797-PMP-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120411847
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s fully briefed Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2011 Order regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Remand Plaintiff's Claims Under Nevada Law to the Eighth Judicial Court of Nevada (Doc. #319), and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #319) is DENIED. IT IS FURT
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s fully briefed Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2011 Order regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Remand Plaintiff's Claims Under Nevada Law to the Eighth Judicial Court of Nevada (Doc. #319), and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #319) is DENIED. IT IS FURTH..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
The Court having read and considered Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s fully briefed Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2011 Order regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Remand Plaintiff's Claims Under Nevada Law to the Eighth Judicial Court of Nevada (Doc. #319), and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Communication Services, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #319) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File a Supplement to Plaintiff's Opposition to Sierra's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's November 22, 2011 Order Regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Remand Plaintiff's Claims under Nevada Law to the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada (Doc. #342) and Defendant Sierra's Motion to File Supplemental Authority (Doc. #343) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
