Velasquez v. New Penn Financial, LLC, 15-cv-04863 YGR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160517886
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above-styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Unit for a telephone conference to assess this case's suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephon
Summary: ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above-styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Unit for a telephone conference to assess this case's suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone..
More
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above-styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") Unit for a telephone conference to assess this case's suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as reasonably practicable.
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation for further ADR proceedings.
The Court VACATES the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss currently set for May 24, 2016, and DENIES defendants motion to appear by telephone (Dkt. No. 50) as moot. The Court may re-set the hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
