Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MICHAELSON v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 2:14-cv-388-FtM-38CM. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20141215759 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Walter Michaelson's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants UBS Financial Services, Inc., Eric Beadle, Susan Grandstaff, Julene Richards, and Dustin Smith (Doc. #14) filed on December 11, 2014. Only Defendant UBS Bank USA, Inc. is to remain in this action. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants UBS Finan
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Walter Michaelson's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants UBS Financial Services, Inc., Eric Beadle, Susan Grandstaff, Julene Richards, and Dustin Smith (Doc. #14) filed on December 11, 2014. Only Defendant UBS Bank USA, Inc. is to remain in this action.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants UBS Financial Services, Inc., Eric Beadle, Susan Grandstaff, Julene Richards, and Dustin Smith (Doc. #14) is GRANTED. (2) Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an amended complaint by December 29, 2014, naming and asserting claims against Defendant UBS Bank USA, Inc. only. Defendant UBS Bank USA, Inc. shall have fourteen (14) days from the date it received the amended complaint to respond accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer