Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOPKINS v. U.S., CR612-011. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20141226560 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. SO ORDERED.

ORDER

B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.

After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer