PICKENS v. STATE, 65 So.3d 119 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20110630229
Filed: Jun. 30, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. In this Anders appeal, we affirm the imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the correction of a scrivener's error. In case 09-1298, the appellant was convicted of armed robbery pursuant to section 812.13(2)(a), not section 812.135 as listed. In case 09-1299, the appellant was convicted of home invasion robbery, not armed robbery. AFFIRMED, but REMANDED with instructions to correct the scrivener's errors. VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, we affirm the imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the correction of a scrivener's error. In case 09-1298, the appellant was convicted of armed robbery pursuant to section 812.13(2)(a), not section 812.135 as listed. In case 09-1299, the appellant was convicted of home invasion robbery, not armed robbery.
AFFIRMED, but REMANDED with instructions to correct the scrivener's errors.
VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
