BRYAN v. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY US, 11-7336. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120222167
Filed: Feb. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US , No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US , No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Defense Tech. US, No. 1:10-cv-02834-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
