Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: OPINION ON DAMAGES AS TO DEFENDANT MOUNT ZION HOLDINGS, INC. JAMES LAWRENCE KING , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the affidavit of Plaintiff Tamara Castanon docketed August 21, 2019 (D.E. 24-1) in support of her Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Mount Zion Holdings, Inc. ("Mount Zion") (D.E. 20). On August 15, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Mount Zion as to liability, where it failed to retain counsel, and allo
Summary: OPINION ON DAMAGES AS TO DEFENDANT MOUNT ZION HOLDINGS, INC. JAMES LAWRENCE KING , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the affidavit of Plaintiff Tamara Castanon docketed August 21, 2019 (D.E. 24-1) in support of her Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Mount Zion Holdings, Inc. ("Mount Zion") (D.E. 20). On August 15, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Mount Zion as to liability, where it failed to retain counsel, and allow..
More
OPINION ON DAMAGES AS TO DEFENDANT MOUNT ZION HOLDINGS, INC.
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the affidavit of Plaintiff Tamara Castanon docketed August 21, 2019 (D.E. 24-1) in support of her Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Mount Zion Holdings, Inc. ("Mount Zion") (D.E. 20).
On August 15, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Mount Zion as to liability, where it failed to retain counsel, and allowed Plaintiff to submit a new affidavit "stating facts to support the damages amount she requests" (D.E. 22, at 2-3). The Court specifically flagged Plaintiff's request for $22,600.00 in back pay for her retaliatory discharge claim: "Plaintiff states no facts to show she made any effort to mitigate her damages, for example by seeking other employment," citing Nord v. U.S. Steel Corp., 758 F.2d 1462, 1471-72 (11th Cir. 1988) (id. at 2).
In her new affidavit, Plaintiff states that she "performed [her] work satisfactorily" at all times during her employment, and "was fired due to [her] requests to be paid overtime" (D.E. 24-1, ¶¶ 18-19). She states that, although she "immediately started looking for a new job, [she] was unable to find one for 4 weeks," after which she started work as a part-time employee earning $150 per week (id. ¶¶ 20-21), but she had been making $700 per week when employed by Mount Zion (id. ¶ 24). She continues: "I have been continuously making efforts to find a second job in order to cover my expenses but have been unable to do so" and "am now forced to move to live at my sister's house" (id. ¶¶ 22-23).
First, the Court finds that, as to her unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation claims, Castanon sufficiently set forth calculations of five weeks' minimum wages totaling $2,475.00 (see D.E. 24-1, ¶ 16), and 52 weeks' overtime compensation totaling $4,917.80 (see id. ¶ 17). Second, as to her request for back pay, the Court finds that Castanon has now provided facts in her sworn affidavit to support her request for back pay for retaliatory discharge, and on the basis of those facts is entitled to back pay in the amount of $22,600.00. Third, the Court finds Plaintiff is due liquidated damages in the amounts of $2,475.00 and $4,917.80 where Mount Zion has defaulted on Plaintiff's FLSA minimum wage and overtime compensation claims.1
Therefore, the Court concludes that, based on Plaintiff Tamara Castanon's uncontradicted, defaulted testimony in her affidavit, she is due to be awarded a total of $37,385.60 from Defendant Mount Zion Holdings, Inc. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), final default judgment against Defendant Mount Zion Holdings, Inc. will be set out in a separate document.
DONE and ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of August, 2019.