EMORY v. TAYLOR, 5:15-cv-105 (MTT). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150903960
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 5). After screening the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the Magistrate Judge allowed the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Akunwanne to go forward but recommends dismissing the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has review
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 5). After screening the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the Magistrate Judge allowed the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Akunwanne to go forward but recommends dismissing the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewe..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 5). After screening the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge allowed the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Akunwanne to go forward but recommends dismissing the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
