SMITH v. WETZEL, 13-2410. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170420e21
Visitors: 30
Filed: Apr. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this __ 18th ____ day of April, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the parties' briefs and related filings, and after review of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa's Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED . 2. The petition for writ of ha
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this __ 18th ____ day of April, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the parties' briefs and related filings, and after review of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa's Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED . 2. The petition for writ of hab..
More
ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this __ 18th ____ day of April, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the parties' briefs and related filings, and after review of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa's Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
