Osborne v. Dorris, 16-cv-1292-JPG-MAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20190619a85
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered on Count 1 (a claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical need for his nerve pain medication in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment) in favor of defendants Gerald W. Dorris, Sue Funkhouser, Leon Kehrer, and Ashley Crider and against James M. Osborne, an
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered on Count 1 (a claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical need for his nerve pain medication in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment) in favor of defendants Gerald W. Dorris, Sue Funkhouser, Leon Kehrer, and Ashley Crider and against James M. Osborne, and..
More
JUDGMENT
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered on Count 1 (a claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical need for his nerve pain medication in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment) in favor of defendants Gerald W. Dorris, Sue Funkhouser, Leon Kehrer, and Ashley Crider and against James M. Osborne, and that this case is dismissed with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Count 2 (a claim for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's serious medical need for AIDS and Hepatitis C tests in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment) is dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
